Latest from Senate Budget Reconciliation Negotiations

June 28, 2025

Sounds like Senate Republicans received the full text of the proposed and newly amended Senate Budget Reconciliation bill just hours ago although the pressure has been turned up by the White House to move the process forward regardless of complaints from some lawmakers who want to read the bill (it’s over 900 pages) before voting. (SEE ATTACHED DRAFT BILL)

Fresh megabill text overnight: what’s in and what’s out

Senate Republicans are hoping that final tweaks can smooth the path to passage.
By Katherine Tully-McManus | 06/28/2025 10:47 AM EDT, Politico
 

The Senate megabill has gone through what Republicans hope will be its final “Byrd bath” — and the chamber will be working through the weekend as Republicans hustle to get their domestic policy bill to President Donald Trump’s desk by July 4.

The latest text of the measure(SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT) which Senate leaders are hoping to start procedural votes on Saturday afternoon, was released just before midnight. The latest text reflects rulings by the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, after she warned Republicans that several pieces of the bill didn’t meet strict budget reconciliation rules that allow the bill to pass along party lines.

Between Byrd rule compliance and senators’ own concerns about impacts of certain cuts and policies, there were a deluge of changes in the latest text.

Here’s a roundup of some of what’s new: 

Health care: Senate Republicans are planning to provide a $25 billion stabilization fund for rural hospitals over five years. That’s a significant increase from the $15 billion offer Senate GOP leadership had made to a group of Medicaid moderates earlier. The new package also delays cuts to provider taxes that fund state obligations to Medicaid, with the drawdown beginning in 2028.

SALT: The new Senate text keeps House Republicans’ plan to increase the deduction from $10,000 to $40,000. But it would snap back to current levels after 2029. The change is expected to shave at least $100 billion from the approximately $350 billion price tag of the House plan.

SNAP: Alaska and Hawaii could be temporarily exempted from the requirement for cost-sharing for the nation’s largest anti-hunger program under the new language. The bill grants the Agriculture secretary authority to waive the two states’ cost-share requirement for up to two years if they are “actively implementing” a plan to lower their payment error rates for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Both states would also be eligible for waivers to bypass the new SNAP work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, if the Agriculture secretary deems they are making a “good faith effort” to comply with the requirements.

Energy: The new text would require solar and wind generation projects seeking to qualify for the Inflation Reduction Act’s clean electricity production and investment tax credits to be placed in service — or plugged into the grid — by the end of 2027. That’s much more restrictive than an earlier version that tied eligibility to when a project begins construction. It would also deny wind and solar leasing arrangements to residential customers from accessing the climate law’s clean electricity investment and production tax credits.

The bill has more energy changes, including:

  • Moving up the termination date for electric vehicle tax credits to Sept. 30, compared to six months after enactment in the earlier Finance text. 
  • A bonus incentive for advanced nuclear facilities built in communities with high levels of employment in the nuclear industry. 
  • Expand to $1 billion a new energy dominance loan program. 
  • Mandate oil and gas lease sales onshore and offshore, including in Alaska’s Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, with the state reaping an increased proportion of revenues from development there.

Land sales: The bill would order the sale of up to 0.5 percent of Bureau of Land Management land across 11 states. Eligible lands would have to fall within five miles of a population center, and protected lands excluded. The new text would set aside money from each sale for hunting, fishing and recreational amenities. The parliamentarian has yet to rule on the new framework, after flagging a previous version.

Federal pensions: The new text eliminates a proposal to hike federal employees’ required retirement contributions and charge unions for time spent engaging in organizing activities, after the parliamentarian ruled that several of the GOP’s civil service provisions violated the chamber’s reconciliation rules.

Education: Gone from the new bill language are provisions to expand the Pell Grants to short-term workforce training programs outside of the accreditation system and at for-profit programs. The change came after the Senate parliamentarian warned that it ran afoul of the chamber’s strict reconciliation rules.

Also stripped out was language that blocked doctors and dentists from having their student loan payments during residency count toward Public Service Loan Forgiveness. The new language would delay — rather than repeal — Biden era regulations that made it easier for student borrowers to have federal loans forgiven if schools either defrauded them or closed for 10 years.

Immigration: At the recommendation of the parliamentarian, the latest version of the bill does not include language that would have limited the ability of federal courts to issue preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders against the U.S. if a bond had not been posted.

Jordain Carney, Juan Perez Jr., Hailey Fuchs, Kelsey Tamborrino, James Bikales, Timothy Cama, Kelsey Brugger, Garrett Downs, Manuel Quiñones, Lawrence Ukenye, Benjamin Guggenheim  and Samuel Benson contributed to this report.

 
——————————

The Senate sub-committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Farming put forward changes to the Senate SNAP.  Most of the changes have to do with state responsibilities for overseeing the Program and ensuring low error rates in terms of eligibility, with a focus on fraud and abuse, etc. 

See the last 4 yellow highlighted sections of the article directly below to read about changes to the Senate bill in the area of Medicaid Work Requirements.   

Senate Republicans make last-minute SNAP changes in Trump bill ahead of vote

BY ARIS FOLLEY – 06/28/25 10:31 , The Hill

The bill would still require some states to cover a share of the cost of SNAP benefits, which are currently completely funded by the federal government, if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028.

But the updated text also sharpens the proposal even further when it comes to which year’s error rates can be used to help determine the share a state could have to pay under the plan. 

The plan explicitly allows states to choose between using data from fiscal years 2025 or 2026 to calculate the states’ match for fiscal 2028. In fiscal 2029 and beyond, the match will be calculated based on the error rate from three fiscal years before.

However, the new bill also includes a “waiver authority” section that could allow for noncontiguous states, or Alaska and Hawaii, to see the requirements waived if they’re found to be “actively implementing a corrective action plan” and carrying out other activities to reduce their error rate.

Up Next – DC Bureau: Iranian House Intel Briefing
 

 

The update comes as Alaska Republicans have recently raised concerns over the proposal.

“Our big thing is the data to be used, the data to be used on the error rate,” Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska.) told The Hill on Friday ahead of the new bill text’s release. “So, that’s important to make sure that the data is as accurate and reflective of the year you’re judging as possible.”

As part of the proposed SNAP plan, states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent to 15 percent.

Numbers from the Agriculture Department showed Alaska’s payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — reached above 60 percent in fiscal year 2023. The national average hit 11.68 percent. 

Sullivan said his state has seen much lower payment error rates prior to the pandemic and is on track to improve those figures, noting new numbers are expected soon. But he added, “It’s still higher than our traditional error rate, and as you know, the cost share is based in part on that.”

Asked briefly about the party’s SNAP proposals, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) told The Hill on Friday, “We’re still in trouble on SNAP.” 

“The implementation is still next to impossible for us,” she said.

Republicans say the proposal is aimed at incentivizing states to get their payment error rates down, while Democrats have argued the measure could lead to states having to cut benefits.

The Senate proposal also seeks to narrow exceptions for work requirements for nondisabled adults and calls for upping the age that nondisabled adults to “continue working through 64,” a committee breakdown of the bill details. 

But in a change from the initial text unveiled by the Senate Agriculture Committee weeks back, the bill also includes a exemption for parents or guardians of children under the age of 14, and carve outs for those who are are “Indians, Urban Indians, California Indians, and other Indians who are eligible for the Indian Health Services,” the committee said.

The bill still does not include language preserving exemptions for veterans, homeless individuals and youth that were in foster care previously greenlit by Congress as part of a bipartisan deal in 2023. But the committee also told The Hill earlier this month that its plan would still not require “individuals who are physically or mentally unfit for employment … to meet the 20 hours per week work requirement whether in those groups or not.”

Other proposals in the SNAP plan also seek to limit the federal government’s ability to increase monthly benefits in the future and include a chunk of farm provisions that GOP leaders have argued will make it easier to craft a bipartisan farm bill in the months ahead — although Democrats have said otherwise.


 
 

Report finds five north country hospitals at risk if Republican Medicaid cuts pass Congress

Five hospitals in the north country could be faced with steep cuts to their operating revenues if the budget bill Republicans are pushing through Congress right now passes, according to analysis from the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill’s Sheps Center for Health Services Research.
 
Analysis from the center found that rural hospitals across the country would be majorly hurt by the Medicaid cuts the Republican budget bill calls for, because rural hospitals often have a significant portion of their patient pool, sometimes a majority of it, in the Medicaid or Medicare programs that serve poor and elderly people, respectively.
 
The Sheps Center looked for hospitals that are both in the top 10% of Medicaid payer mix, meaning they have the largest proportions of Medicaid patients to non-Medicaid patients, and that have reported three straight years of negative total operating margins, meaning they’ve been paying out more money than they’ve been taking in.
 
In New York, 11 hospitals fit that criteria, including 5 in the north country; Claxton-Hepburn Medical Center in Ogdensburg, Massena Hospital, Clifton-Fine Hospital in Star Lake, Gouverneur Hospital and Lewis County General Hospital in Lowville.
 
Ogdensburg and Lowville are not considered top Medicaid providers, but they do each serve a significant number of Medicaid recipients each year and both demonstrate negative annual margins.
 
The Sheps Center analysis posits that the cuts to Medicaid, which come from a combination of changes to federal support for Medicaid spending, expanded work requirements and adjustments to the fees and taxes states can charge providers, would result in significant numbers of everyday Americans being kicked off of the program. Those people would still need emergency medical care as they receive at hospitals, which have a duty to provide it, but those hospitals would no longer be paid for the care they provide at all.
 
In a letter to President Donald J. Trump and the Republican leaders in the House and Senate, Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., and three other Democratic Senate leaders implored them to reverse course on the Medicaid cuts outlined in the reconciliation bill, which Trump has named the “One Big Beautiful Bill.”
“Many of these rural hospitals are facing financial instability today, even before any of the Republican health care cuts take effect,” their letter reads. “Rural hospitals will be disproportionately impacted by health care cuts. Addressing the crisis in rural health care access is a national, bipartisan priority, and it should be bipartisan to not worsen it. However, if your party passes these health care cuts into law, Americans in rural communities across the country risk losing health care services and jobs supported by their local hospitals.”
 
State Democrats are criticizing north country Rep. Elise M. Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, for backing the bill and continuing to support it as Republicans push it to final approval.
 
“Five hospitals in Elise Stefanik’s district are on the chopping block because of her vote for the largest cut to Medicaid in history,” said Addison Dick, spokesperson for the state Democratic Party. “Instead of fighting for her constituents, Stefanik is caving to Trump and supporting his budget that will rip away coverage, increase health care costs, and devastate rural health care.”
 
A spokesperson for Stefanik pushed back on the claims that the Medicaid provisions in the reconciliation package will result in loss of coverage for her constituents, which he called an “indespensible lifeline for our nation’s most vulnerable.”
 
“However, far left Democrats continue to fearmonger because they know that President Trump is delivering results for the American people,” the spokesperson said. “He ran on the promise that he would root out the wasteful and fraudulent government spending. In New York alone, an estimated $20 billion is spent on fraudulent Medicaid claims annually. On top of this insurmountable burden resting on the shoulders of hardworking taxpayers, illegals are also eligible for Emergency Medicaid which has ballooned more than 1,200 percent since 2014. This spending is unsustainable and in order to continue protecting and preserving benefits for America’s most vulnerable, waste, fraud, and abuse must be rooted out.”
 
The Empire Center for Public Policy, a conservative New York think tank, found in late 2024 that as many as 3 million New Yorkers may be fraudulently collecting Medicaid and other health insurance benefits from the state, basing their analysis off of census data and information obtained from the state Medicaid program.
 
Overall, 44% of New Yorkers receive Medicaid or a similar program, including children on the state-level Child Health Plus program and the New York Essential Plan, provided through the American Care Act health insurance marketplace and providing Medicaid-like coverage to people making up to 250% of the federal poverty level.
 
The Empire Center also found earlier this year that the state program to offer emergency medicaid to undocumented immigrants, which has 480,000 people enrolled as of March, represents 7% of total Medicaid enrollment in the state.
 
If the reconciliation package passes into law with the provisions for Medicaid included in the House-passed version, the federal government could cut the money it pays to the state for its portion of Medicaid funding, which would reduce available benefits for all recipients.
 
Stefanik, who has floated a run for governor next year and has made criticisms of state programs aiding undocumented immigrants a core part of her early, pre-campaign message, said in a visit to Albany last month that she would seek to use executive actions and push the state legislature to end the emergency Medicaid program and cut down on fraud if elected.
 
Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul, who is running for reelection, has not expressed any interest in changing that aspect of the state’s Medicaid operations.
 
It’s not clear if the final package will include the major Medicaid provisions as passed by the House. On Thursday, the U.S. Senate Parliamentarian, which is charged with ensuring all actions taken by that chamber follow the proper laws and procedures, struck many of the most impactful Medicaid provisions from the bill for procedural reasons. Whatever resulting legislation passes in the U.S. Senate will have to go back to the House for a final vote before it can go to the president for approval. The two chambers have not seen eye to eye on many aspects of the reconciliation bill.
 
Trump has demanded that lawmakers deliver a finished bill to his desk by July 4