June 28, 2025
| Sounds like Senate Republicans received the full text of the proposed and newly amended Senate Budget Reconciliation bill just hours ago although the pressure has been turned up by the White House to move the process forward regardless of complaints from some lawmakers who want to read the bill (it’s over 900 pages) before voting. (SEE ATTACHED DRAFT BILL) |
| Senate Republicans are hoping that final tweaks can smooth the path to passage. |
| By Katherine Tully-McManus | 06/28/2025 10:47 AM EDT, Politico |
|
|
|
The Senate megabill has gone through what Republicans hope will be its final “Byrd bath” — and the chamber will be working through the weekend as Republicans hustle to get their domestic policy bill to President Donald Trump’s desk by July 4. The latest text of the measure, (SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT) which Senate leaders are hoping to start procedural votes on Saturday afternoon, was released just before midnight. The latest text reflects rulings by the parliamentarian, Elizabeth MacDonough, after she warned Republicans that several pieces of the bill didn’t meet strict budget reconciliation rules that allow the bill to pass along party lines. Between Byrd rule compliance and senators’ own concerns about impacts of certain cuts and policies, there were a deluge of changes in the latest text. Here’s a roundup of some of what’s new: Health care: Senate Republicans are planning to provide a $25 billion stabilization fund for rural hospitals over five years. That’s a significant increase from the $15 billion offer Senate GOP leadership had made to a group of Medicaid moderates earlier. The new package also delays cuts to provider taxes that fund state obligations to Medicaid, with the drawdown beginning in 2028. SALT: The new Senate text keeps House Republicans’ plan to increase the deduction from $10,000 to $40,000. But it would snap back to current levels after 2029. The change is expected to shave at least $100 billion from the approximately $350 billion price tag of the House plan. SNAP: Alaska and Hawaii could be temporarily exempted from the requirement for cost-sharing for the nation’s largest anti-hunger program under the new language. The bill grants the Agriculture secretary authority to waive the two states’ cost-share requirement for up to two years if they are “actively implementing” a plan to lower their payment error rates for the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program. Both states would also be eligible for waivers to bypass the new SNAP work requirements for able-bodied adults without dependents, if the Agriculture secretary deems they are making a “good faith effort” to comply with the requirements. Energy: The new text would require solar and wind generation projects seeking to qualify for the Inflation Reduction Act’s clean electricity production and investment tax credits to be placed in service — or plugged into the grid — by the end of 2027. That’s much more restrictive than an earlier version that tied eligibility to when a project begins construction. It would also deny wind and solar leasing arrangements to residential customers from accessing the climate law’s clean electricity investment and production tax credits. The bill has more energy changes, including:
Land sales: The bill would order the sale of up to 0.5 percent of Bureau of Land Management land across 11 states. Eligible lands would have to fall within five miles of a population center, and protected lands excluded. The new text would set aside money from each sale for hunting, fishing and recreational amenities. The parliamentarian has yet to rule on the new framework, after flagging a previous version. Federal pensions: The new text eliminates a proposal to hike federal employees’ required retirement contributions and charge unions for time spent engaging in organizing activities, after the parliamentarian ruled that several of the GOP’s civil service provisions violated the chamber’s reconciliation rules. Education: Gone from the new bill language are provisions to expand the Pell Grants to short-term workforce training programs outside of the accreditation system and at for-profit programs. The change came after the Senate parliamentarian warned that it ran afoul of the chamber’s strict reconciliation rules. Also stripped out was language that blocked doctors and dentists from having their student loan payments during residency count toward Public Service Loan Forgiveness. The new language would delay — rather than repeal — Biden era regulations that made it easier for student borrowers to have federal loans forgiven if schools either defrauded them or closed for 10 years. Immigration: At the recommendation of the parliamentarian, the latest version of the bill does not include language that would have limited the ability of federal courts to issue preliminary injunctions or temporary restraining orders against the U.S. if a bond had not been posted. Jordain Carney, Juan Perez Jr., Hailey Fuchs, Kelsey Tamborrino, James Bikales, Timothy Cama, Kelsey Brugger, Garrett Downs, Manuel Quiñones, Lawrence Ukenye, Benjamin Guggenheim and Samuel Benson contributed to this report. |
|
——————————
|
The Senate sub-committee on Agriculture, Nutrition and Farming put forward changes to the Senate SNAP. Most of the changes have to do with state responsibilities for overseeing the Program and ensuring low error rates in terms of eligibility, with a focus on fraud and abuse, etc.
See the last 4 yellow highlighted sections of the article directly below to read about changes to the Senate bill in the area of Medicaid Work Requirements.
Senate Republicans make last-minute SNAP changes in Trump bill ahead of vote
|
BY ARIS FOLLEY – 06/28/25 10:31 , The Hill
The bill would still require some states to cover a share of the cost of SNAP benefits, which are currently completely funded by the federal government, if they have a payment error rate above 6 percent beginning in fiscal 2028. But the updated text also sharpens the proposal even further when it comes to which year’s error rates can be used to help determine the share a state could have to pay under the plan.
The plan explicitly allows states to choose between using data from fiscal years 2025 or 2026 to calculate the states’ match for fiscal 2028. In fiscal 2029 and beyond, the match will be calculated based on the error rate from three fiscal years before. However, the new bill also includes a “waiver authority” section that could allow for noncontiguous states, or Alaska and Hawaii, to see the requirements waived if they’re found to be “actively implementing a corrective action plan” and carrying out other activities to reduce their error rate. Up Next – DC Bureau: Iranian House Intel Briefing
The update comes as Alaska Republicans have recently raised concerns over the proposal. “Our big thing is the data to be used, the data to be used on the error rate,” Sen. Dan Sullivan (R-Alaska.) told The Hill on Friday ahead of the new bill text’s release. “So, that’s important to make sure that the data is as accurate and reflective of the year you’re judging as possible.” As part of the proposed SNAP plan, states with higher payment error rates cover a greater share of benefit costs. If the error rate is 6 percent or higher, states would be subject to a sliding scale that could see their share of allotments rise to a range of between 5 percent to 15 percent. Numbers from the Agriculture Department showed Alaska’s payment error rate — which factors in overpayment and underpayment error rates — reached above 60 percent in fiscal year 2023. The national average hit 11.68 percent. Sullivan said his state has seen much lower payment error rates prior to the pandemic and is on track to improve those figures, noting new numbers are expected soon. But he added, “It’s still higher than our traditional error rate, and as you know, the cost share is based in part on that.” Asked briefly about the party’s SNAP proposals, Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) told The Hill on Friday, “We’re still in trouble on SNAP.” “The implementation is still next to impossible for us,” she said.
Republicans say the proposal is aimed at incentivizing states to get their payment error rates down, while Democrats have argued the measure could lead to states having to cut benefits. The Senate proposal also seeks to narrow exceptions for work requirements for nondisabled adults and calls for upping the age that nondisabled adults to “continue working through 64,” a committee breakdown of the bill details. But in a change from the initial text unveiled by the Senate Agriculture Committee weeks back, the bill also includes a exemption for parents or guardians of children under the age of 14, and carve outs for those who are are “Indians, Urban Indians, California Indians, and other Indians who are eligible for the Indian Health Services,” the committee said. The bill still does not include language preserving exemptions for veterans, homeless individuals and youth that were in foster care previously greenlit by Congress as part of a bipartisan deal in 2023. But the committee also told The Hill earlier this month that its plan would still not require “individuals who are physically or mentally unfit for employment … to meet the 20 hours per week work requirement whether in those groups or not.” Other proposals in the SNAP plan also seek to limit the federal government’s ability to increase monthly benefits in the future and include a chunk of farm provisions that GOP leaders have argued will make it easier to craft a bipartisan farm bill in the months ahead — although Democrats have said otherwise. |
Report finds five north country hospitals at risk if Republican Medicaid cuts pass Congress
- 12 hrs ago